Skip to main content
Jean Silver-Isenstadt's picture

Add your voice to the comments

This piece was written and submitted by Erin Wyner, MD, a family physician and proud member of the National Physicians Alliance.


As a physician, I am deeply concerned about the extreme opposition from the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops to important new rules requiring employers that provide health insurance to their employees to include coverage for contraception.  Churches were originally exempt from this rule, and the Obama administration has made an additional accommodation for religious organizations such as hospitals and universities that oppose contraception, requiring instead that the insurance company pays for contraceptive coverage in cases where institutions object on religious grounds.  The Catholic Health Association and Catholic Charities support this compromise.  Still, the Bishops are threatening a legislative attack on even these flexible contraceptive coverage provisions.

Why does this matter?  Because the Catholic Church and its subsidiary institutions employ thousands of women who hold no religious bias against birth control.  By blocking access to this legal preventive health service, they are impeding the freedom of their employees.  It is also critical to acknowledge that women take birth control for many reasons beyond contraception: regulation of menstrual cycles and pain, prevention of anemia, endometrial cancer and ovarian cancer, and management of ovarian cysts.  A recent study by the Guttmacher institute indicates that 14% of adult pill users are on the pill exclusively for non-contraceptive reasons, while 58% of women are on the pill at least in part for non-contraceptive reasons, including treatment of endometriosis and menstrual migraines.

I want to be clear: I believe in access to birth control for all individuals, regardless of whether they are teens trying to prevent pregnancy or married 40-year-olds with fibroids.  I also support religious freedom.  Perhaps we can find some common ground in agreeing that women are entitled to appropriate treatment of their medical problems.  Some medical problems are women-specific, and they call for hormonal treatments.  Denying women these treatments is sex-based discrimination, plain and simple.

-By Erin Wyner, MD

The views and opinions expressed in this post are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect those of strongly encourages our readers to post comments in response to blog posts. We value diversity of opinions and perspectives. Our goals for this space are to be educational, thought-provoking, and respectful. So we actively moderate comments and we reserve the right to edit or remove comments that undermine these goals. Thanks!

#KeepMarching: It’s a Giving Tuesday Match!

Rise up to protect women and families in America. Make a contribution to MomsRising between now and midnight on Giving Tuesday, Nov. 28, and your gift will be immediately matched by another generous donor!

A $25 gift becomes $50. Your $100 gift become $200!

Thank you. Your support means everything to us.

close window