Skip to main content
Laetitia Mailhes's picture

There are no two ways to slice this: the genetically-engineered apple that the USDA is about to approve is not good news. Here is why:

1/ Despite what the powers that be are claiming, there is NO conclusive scientific evidence that GMO (genetically modified organisms) are safe for our health, our children's and their children's. Just allow me to share that the disturbing news regarding the health issues of pigs that have been fed GMO over several generations gives me pause, to say the least. Feeding our children GMO corn syrup-laced processed food is bad enough. Many of us are aware of the risk. Now, the prospect of GMO hiding in apples, the very epitome of kids' healthy snack, is too creepy for words.

2/ Genetically-engineered apple orchards are bound to impact our environment. The trick is, we frankly don't know how. There's no need to be a Ph.D. in Natural Resources Management to understand that, unfortunately, the long-term impact of trees is of a different order of magnitude than that of crops like corn.

3/ Just because the risks to human health and the environment are uncertain doesn't mean that Okanagan Specialty Fruits Inc., the company behind the Arctic Apple (as it is called), should be given a blank check by the US government. In fact, uncertainty is precisely what Europeans invoke when they apply the precautionary principle. It goes like this: show me it's safe, and I'll give you the green light—you'll sit on the shelf until then.

That option sounds reasonable enough, especially when the risk that the USDA is about to gamble with is for no other purpose than... cosmetics. That's right. The Arctic Apple is genetically-engineered to NOT turn brown. It's designed to sell well not thanks to its improved nutritious value (it has none) but because it will be able to age and bruise while still looking young, fresh and vibrant in the produce aisle.

If those are not reasons enough to tell the USDA to NOT deregulate this Canadian invention, check here more arguments why the plan is truly a terrible idea.

Chime in fast through this petition: the USDA's public comments period ends Monday, December 16.

The views and opinions expressed in this post are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect those of strongly encourages our readers to post comments in response to blog posts. We value diversity of opinions and perspectives. Our goals for this space are to be educational, thought-provoking, and respectful. So we actively moderate comments and we reserve the right to edit or remove comments that undermine these goals. Thanks!