Skip to main content
Dora Calott Wang's picture

The Newtown, Tucson and Virginia Tech “shooters” all chose guns over mental health care. So we debate gun control.

But a true solution must involve a serious examination of our mental health system. Even if Adam Lanza, Jared Loughner and Seung-hui Cho had no access to guns, they still would have been seriously mentally unstable and dangerous.

From the time of asylums, safety has been a primary purpose of psychiatric institutions. Treatment of mental illness was secondary, as antipsychotic and antidepressant medications were not invented until the 1950’s.

Why is our psychiatric system now failing to keep our communities safe? It’s not that treatments today don’t work. Medications for serious mental illness are better today than ever. In fact, they are so user-friendly that atypical antipsychotics (Seroquel, Abilify, etc.) outsell any other class of medication including antibiotics, anti-hypertensives, and even cholesterol-lowering drugs.

The problem is that many citizens in need often can’t access mental health care--or they look at the mental health system, and choose to avoid it.

Mental health care must be more accessible—and more desirable—than guns.

But here’s what happens before a patient sees a psychiatrist. First, he must navigate his insurance company to figure out which psychiatrist his insurance will cover. Next, he must find a psychiatrist who will see him.

Once he gets to a psychiatrist’s office, he is confronted with a tome of paperwork regarding privacy, and commitments to pay. He may be nervous about signing these contracts—but if he doesn’t, liability and malpractice concerns will keep the psychiatrist from seeing him. If he finally makes it into the shrink’s office, the patient may only get a diagnosis and pills. Or, as some patients put it—“I’ll be told something’s wrong with me, and not the crazy world.”

All the while, he is likely to hear many phone recordings directing him to 9-1-1 or the nearest emergency room.
This kind of “caring” has put our whole nation into a state of emergency.

Here’s a solution.

Caring and compassion have been the foundations of medical care since ancient times. They work far faster than pills—and they just might make mental health care more attractive than guns.

Yet in today’s health care system, a doctor must devote one-third of his/her time to bureaucracy. The doctor-patient relationship may last one session, if at all.

Let the recent tragedies remind us that any community is only as stable as the least stable citizen among us. Then let’s ponder the numbers. One percent of any population is schizophrenic. That makes approximately 3-million citizens among the US population of 300-million. Another one to two percent, or 3- to 6-million Americans suffer serious bipolar disorder. That is not counting citizens with addictions, other mental disorders, and people who are just plain crazy.

How much can gun control do?

The views and opinions expressed in this post are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect those of strongly encourages our readers to post comments in response to blog posts. We value diversity of opinions and perspectives. Our goals for this space are to be educational, thought-provoking, and respectful. So we actively moderate comments and we reserve the right to edit or remove comments that undermine these goals. Thanks!