School Rules= Lower Obesity
Posted August 31st, 2012 by Kristin Rowe-Finkbeiner and Claire MoshenbergWhat makes it more likely that an overweight or obese 5th grader won’t remain obese by the 8th grade? Location, location, location!
A recent study in the Archive of Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine by Bridging the Gap shows that an overweight or obese 5th grader who lives in a state with strong laws that restrict the sale of unhealthy snacks and beverages in schools is less likely to remain so by the 8th grade than their peers in states without these laws.
Researchers observed children and teens for three years, and found that students in schools with strong snack food and beverage laws gained less weight, as they got older.
So what makes a strong snack food and beverage law? It’s simple: A state law that requires schools to only sell snacks that meet specific nutrition standards. Weak policies, on the other hand, are those that only recommend schools make changes and don’t have specific nutritional guidelines. And the results prove which guidelines are working: Kids and teens in states with weak school snack and beverage policies experienced the same increase in their body mass indices (BMIs) as students in states with no policies.
It can be hard for kids to ignore the siren song of candy, soda, ice cream, fries, burgers, and chips, especially when they’re prominently displayed every day in school vending machines and à la carte lines. Those junk foods compete against healthy snack options like fruits and veggies for kids’ attention.
“Companies know that they are creating the palates of the child’s lifetime if they get in now,” says Alison Crockett, a mom who found cookies marauding as breakfast when she visited her child’s cafeteria. “If they get them hooked on their sweet, salty, fatty products, that’s what they will crave for their entire lives. [Parents] are training our children for habits for a long, healthy life.”
“I just think it’s a huge mistake to think snack=dessert. And I have to admit, my pet peeve is when snacks=sweet baked goods,” says Cynthia Liu. She conducted a mini experiment during snack time at her son’s Chinese school: Instead of bringing in the customary Capri-Suns and sugary snacks, she set out a plate of apple slices and veggies. The result? The kids “GOBBLED THE APPLE SLICES AND VEGETABLES like they were going out of style. They. Were. Happy.”
Moms like Alison and Cynthia know that starting healthy snacking habits early is important for kids’ health. The good news is, there are states that are catching on to what moms already know. Some states are paying attention and swapping junky snacks and sugary drinks with nutritious replacements. Some states have passed laws that prohibit schools from selling certain unhealthy foods or drinks, or that set limits for the fat, salt, sugar or calorie content of items.
While it’s great that some states are making positive strides, the national standards on snack foods and beverages in schools are extremely limited, which jeopardizes the health of kids in states with weak or nonexistent policies. Improving the nutritional quality of snacks and drinks can help to reduce children’s risk for obesity, type 2 diabetes, high blood pressure and other chronic illnesses — a critical goal at a time when nearly one in three kids in the United States is overweight or obese. Cynthia’s successful apple slice snack wasn’t an exception: A growing number of schools across the country already have proven that students will buy healthier snacks and beverages when junk food is removed.
Fired up? Let the USDA know that you support nutritional standards for school snacks! Raise your voice for healthy food for kids.
Read the full Bridging the Gap report HERE.



10 Comments
October 18, 2012 at 5:09 pm by SharonObesity is everyone’s problem!
As a nation, what are we doing to our kids? Obesity among children has tripled since 1980 in the United States. Today, there are approximately 12.5 million children and adolescents aged 2 to 19 years that are obese. Type 2 diabetes is closely linked to obesity. Do you know that type 2 diabetes is also called adult onset diabetes? With our current trend the name needs to change.
According to an article on kidsworldmd.com, doctors are predicting that at least half of the over weight children will grow into obese adults. Obesity increases the risks for other chronic diseases and Doctors are predicting that diseases and complications seen usually in 60s, 70s and 80s will be seen in much younger population. The time to break the cycle is now!
[Reply]
September 22, 2012 at 12:52 pm by SitimaratuGamesLab:Gymnastics: 30 Pullups, Ring Dips, GHD Up DownOHS 10, 10, 10 95/65Back Squat 3 3 @ 85%+Push Press 10, 10, 10 95/65Strict Press 3 3 heavy Then: Perform the following with a 20# or 10# wegiht vest on:Partner WOD5 Rounds ofPartner A: 15 Pullups, 20 Burpees, 30 Situps, 40 Air-squatsPartner B: Row 1K
[Reply]
September 4, 2012 at 4:52 pm by Ashley BI love the invitation to talk about health, not BMI. I like how MomsRising has focused on how we want to focus on the increase of children with high blood pressure and Type 2 diabetes since those are clear health outcomes, not necessarily BMI-driven.
I can’t think of a single reason why a school should provide on its campus food high in salt, fat and calories when wonderful, healthy food is what every child deserves.
[Reply]
September 4, 2012 at 3:21 pm by Elisa BatistaAll children deserve access to healthy foods in school, regardless of where they live. No basic nutritional standards = junk food and pink slime. No thank you.
[Reply]
September 4, 2012 at 3:21 pm by RuthI think this post makes a ton (ha ha) of sense. It’s not about legislating what parents feed their kids – it’s about providing better, healthier choices for kids in schools. No one is saying that sweet baked goods etc don’t have their place (I personally love them) but giving kids unfettered access to that stuff at school is not a great idea. What is a good idea is giving kids choices between healthier options. This is a great post and great info. Thank you!
[Reply]
September 1, 2012 at 4:41 pm by LauraHealth and BMI are not related. I believe that legislating a parent’s right to choose how to feed their child is wrong. Let’s stop policing choice and bodies.
[Reply]
Anonymous Reply:
September 4th, 2012 at 11:23 am
@Laura, An excellent comment!
[Reply]
Donna Reply:
September 4th, 2012 at 3:24 pm
@Laura,
When I go to my son’s middle school and see a huge line of kids waiting in a junk food only snack line, I don’t feel like my right to choose how to feed my kid is being protected. I feel like all my efforts to feed my children healthy foods are being undermined while they are away at school. It’s like always fighting an uphill battle with the school on the side of junk food. I’m happy to know there are healthier foods being served in school lunches now.
[Reply]
Can we please have this story written in a way that talks about the HEALTH of kids rather than their BMI? BMI is a measure of obesity, but not a measure of health. Hooray for talking about healthy food choices. But BOO for confounding health choices with body size. http://danceswithfat.wordpress.com/2012/08/27/yes-virginia-bmi-is-bs/
I love Moms Rising, so let’s get this conversation on the right track, so our kids of all shapes and sizes can focus on health, not appearance.
[Reply]
September 1, 2012 at 9:55 am by SandyLet’s just get this slow process over with and request that all unhealthy foods be outlawed and that anyone found trafficking unhealthy food will be charged with a felony and jail time. Anyone making or baking a sugary, fattening, treat would be at risk of having an officer of the government break down your door and confiscate your home and possessions. Since no one can be trusted to do the right thing for their health, we can create laws that will make everyone criminal until they conform to our right thinking and perspective.
[Reply]
Trackbacks
Leave a Comment