Thao Nguyen

    Women small businesses really need health care reform

    Posted August 4th, 2009 by

    By Nancy Duff Campbell, Co-President, National Women’s Law Center

    - Nancy Duff Campbell is a founder and co-president of the National Women’s Law Center, one of the nation’s pre-eminent women’s rights organizations. A recognized expert on women’s law and public policy issues, for over thirty-five years Ms. Campbell has participated in the development and implementation of key legislative initiatives and litigation protecting women’s rights, with a particular emphasis on issues affecting low income women and their families. The views expressed are her own.  -

    Insurance companies and others who profit from our broken health care system are mobilizing to defeat comprehensive reform by using misinformation and scare tactics. A prime example is the allegation that healthcare legislation – specifically the plan being considered by the House of Representatives – will hurt small businesses.

    The fact is that small business owners, especially women, are already hurting under our current healthcare system. Leah Daniels, 29, is the owner of Hill’s Kitchen – a gourmet kitchenware store that opened last May not far from the U.S. Capitol. Daniels can’t afford to offer health insurance to her three employees. She purchased her own bare-bones plan on the individual market for protection “in case I get hit by a car,” but not much else. It costs her just under $200 a month and doesn’t cover such services as routine doctor’s visits or maternity care. Daniels, who often works 7 days a week, says that she is constantly worried about getting sick.

    Daniels’ problems are, unfortunately, all too typical. A new report by the Council of Economic Advisers (CEA) found that small businesses pay up to 18 percent more than large firms for the same health insurance policy. These higher costs mean that small businesses are considerably less likely than larger businesses to provide health insurance to their employees, and those that do tend to have less comprehensive plans. And Census data show that women-owned businesses are generally smaller than male-owned businesses.

    Small business owners and employees who don’t get coverage at work or through a spouse’s plan may shop for insurance individually. But if they are women – and small businesses that don’t offer health coverage tend to have large proportions of female workers – they are likely to face discrimination in the individual health insurance market. A study by the National Women’s Law Center found that insurance companies routinely charge women higher rates than men for individual policies and offer policies that exclude health needs specific to women, such as maternity care.

    Women who own a small business know that the current health care system is failing them. At a meeting of women small business owners in May, Daniels says, “We went around the room and everyone either had health insurance through their spouse or didn’t have coverage at all. Women talked about being afraid to go to the doctor because they didn’t want to find out that they might be sick. It was really striking.”

    The healthcare reform plans that have begun moving through Congress would help make it possible for small business owners to offer comprehensive, affordable health insurance. The House plan would make insurance more affordable by prohibiting insurance companies from discriminating on the basis of health status or gender and by allowing small businesses to purchase coverage through a new Health Insurance Exchange. The Exchange would reduce administrative costs and offer a choice of plans meeting minimum benefit standards. New tax credits would be available to help some small businesses pay for employee health coverage; the credit would be worth 50 percent of the cost of qualified health coverage expenses for businesses with 10 or fewer employees and average wages of $20,000 or less. It would gradually be reduced until firms reached 25 or more employees or average wages of $40,000 or more.

    If some employers still can’t provide coverage, their employees could purchase insurance directly from the Exchange. Sliding scale subsidies would help make it affordable, and they couldn’t be turned down because of pre-existing conditions or charged more because of their gender or health history. Larger employers who fail to offer health care coverage would be required to pay an additional payroll tax, but under the plan being developed by the House, businesses below a certain size would be exempt. One version would exempt businesses with payrolls of $500,000 or less. Another would set the exemption at $250,000 – but even at this level, 76 percent of all firms would be exempt.

    Opponents of healthcare reform have claimed that small businesses would be hurt by another provision: a graduated surcharge on the very wealthy to help finance health care reform. But the surcharge would only apply to households with adjusted gross income above $350,000 ($280,000 for an individual). As a result, only the wealthiest 1.2 percent of taxpayers – and only 4 to 5 percent of all tax payers with business income – would be subject to the surcharge. Women-owned businesses are especially unlikely to be affected by the surcharge. According to the latest Census data, 96.3 percent of women-owned businesses, compared to 88.9 percent of male-owned businesses, had total receipts below $500,000 – meaning that profits would be well below that level.

    Those who claim that healthcare reform will hurt small businesses should re-examine their facts – and the rest of us should examine who they’re really speaking for. We can’t afford to wait any longer for meaningful reform that will bring a guarantee of quality, affordable comprehensive health care for us all.

    Crossposted from Reuters

    Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...
    * * * * *


    August 10, 2009 at 4:58 am by Ivana Williams

    I am Ivana Williams, web master of some financial websites and blogs. All of my sites are having good internet presence and traffic. I have visited your several times. I liked it a lot and would like to thank you for coming up with such a rich content.

    I would like to add a link of my website in your site. In return, I will also offer you the same quality content page that receives maximum traffic. It will help you enhance your site’s ranking too.

    If this idea sounds interesting to you and if you are interested in the link exchange, please get back to me at ivanawilliams36(at)gmail(dot)com.

    Waiting for your quick positive reply,

    Thanking you,

    Ivana Williams


    August 5, 2009 at 11:45 pm by chris

    If the house plan succeeds in prohibiting insurance companies from discriminating on the basis of health status or gender, how will that reduce the cost for those who are not affected by health status and/or gender. In other words, insuring males and children should cost more to offset the gender discrimination that is imposed to women of child-bearing age. And everyone should pay more in insurance premiums to offset the discrimination that is imposed to members who have chronic disease and co-morbidities. Let’s face it, if some of us choose to live healthy lifestyles then why would we be forced to pay additional costs for our insurance just because we don’t want people who have bad health practices to have to pay more for their insurance. Just as auto insurance is higher for someone who has been arrested for DUI, I think those who choose to smoke, are overweight, are arrested for illegal drug use, etc., should have to pay a higher premium for their health insurance than I. And I would love to see Congress move to incentivize members to have annual physicals, paps smears, adherent drug regimens, etc., with lower premium rates as these practices have proven to reduce the utilization and cost of healthcare. Good healthcare is as much our responsibility as it is the insurance industry and the healthcare system. While we blame the insurance industry, yet as one of the fattest countries in the industrialized world, we bear as much, or more blame with the cost and utilization of healthcare.


    August 5, 2009 at 6:00 am by discount ugg boots

    well done thx so much


    Leave a Comment

    Your name is required
    An Email address is required

    Notify me of follow-up comments via e-mail