“The Health Case for Reforming TSCA,” New Report from Safer Chemicals, Healthy Families

    Posted January 28th, 2010 by Claire Moshenberg

    In Slow Death by Rubber Duck: The Secret Danger of Everyday Things, a new book by Environmentalists Rick Smith and Bruce Lourie, there’s a scene where Smith, caught in the middle of a chaotic two-kid-household bedtime routine, is stopped in his tracks by the discovery of flame retardants in his sons’ new pajamas. It was a familiar scene with heavy implications, one that made me think of a similarly fraught pajama story from my own childhood:

    I was eight years old, standing with my arms spread out, as my mom tailored one of my dad’s old flannel shirts into a nightgown. My new checkered nightie, the missing piece in an overnight bag for an upcoming sleepover, was 100% cotton and flame retardant free. But the lack of chemicals wasn’t the reason I was wearing a repurposed version of my dad’s shirt. I was wearing his shirt because there was no money for new pajamas.

    Money was tight, and over the years there were a lot of things we couldn’t afford. When I think of my mom at that time, sitting on the couch with a calculator, a pile of bills, and a worried face, I wonder what she would have thought if someone had told her to go into our shower and throw almost everything away. If someone had said that we had to ransack our cupboards, toss out our canned soups and plastic tupperwares, and then replace our furniture, our toys, even our clothes, or my sister and I would be at risk for cancer, infertility, and learning disabilities.

    I know what she would have thought: How did these toxins get into our home? And how could we possibly afford to replace all of things they’d tainted? I know not being able to protect her children would have broken her heart.

    Safer Chemicals, Healthy Families just released a new report, “The Health Case for Reforming the Toxic Substances Control Act.” As I read it, I thought of my mom at that age, and the family she worked so hard every day to keep healthy and safe. I know I would never want her or any other mother to feel powerless when it comes to protecting their kids. We need to protect all of our children and take the toxins out of the goods we use every day. And to do this, we need TSCA reform

    In the 34 years since TSCA was enacted, the EPA has only been able to require testing on 200 of the over 80,000 chemicals produced and used in the US, and only 5 of these chemicals have been regulated under the law.(1) The new report from Safer Chemicals, Healthy Families shows how exposure to toxins has drastically increased rates of chronic disease. And chronic illnesses are not only costing us our health, but our also putting a tremendous financial strain on our economy and on our families. Through making some basic changes to this almost 40 year old legislation, we could reduce our health costs from toxic exposures by 10%, saving the US $5 billion annually.

    Here are just a few of the frightening health effects from toxins that the report outlines:

    -Cancer is now the second most common cause of death for Americans under the age of 20, with childhood leukemia and brain cancer rates rising significantly over the past two decades.Bisphenol A, a chemical found in a wide variety of consumer goods including certain formula tins and baby bottles, has recently been shown to cause normal breast tissue to express genes associated with a highly aggressive, and often fatal, form of breast cancer.

    -One in six children under the age of eighteen in the US are effected by learning and developmental disabilities. Autism has increased ten fold over the past fifteen years. Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), featured in a variety of plastic goods, is known to cause neurodevelopmental disorders.

    -Fertility problems are on the rise: The infertility rate for women 18-25 has doubled and sperm counts for men in the U.S., Europe, and Australia are declining. Studies have shown that exposure to the BPA found in polycarbonate plastic and food linings can lead to permanent reproductive changes and an increase in future reproductive health problems.

    We can change the foods we eat, the products we buy, the pajamas we purchase, but it’s not enough. If you’re fortunate enough to be able to make those lifestyle changes, chemicals are so ubiquitous that you and your children will still encounter them at your schools, workplaces, at their friends homes: the list goes on. But there is one big change we all can make: we can work together to reform TSCA. To learn more about the important work Safer Chemicals, Healthy Families is doing around this issue and to check out their new report, visit www.saferchemicals.org. You can also click here to send a letter to Congress urging action on TSCA reform!

    (1) “The Health Case for Reforming TSCA,” Safer Chemicals, Healthy Families

    5 Comments

    March 11, 2010 at 11:52 am by sony ericsson tennis crazy

    Unfortunately, it is not possible to stay away from chamicals, bacterias and polution. Not even the best mother in world can protect her children from it. We just need to follow basic personal hygiene and leave the rest to our immune system.

    [Reply]

    January 30, 2010 at 10:17 am by Melinda Lewis

    Thank you for sharing your story and this perspective. I get so frustrated when the ‘mommy wars’ include this attack on parents who can’t afford to make some of the choices they want to make for their kids, and then are characterized as uninformed, unintelligent, or uncaring as a result: poor-quality childcare, poor-quality food, and now chemicals, too. We need to create an infrastructure that provides these protections and resources as basic rights, so that being able to take care of your kids adequately doesn’t hinge on the size of your income (and, of course, we need paycheck reform and living wages and child support assurance so that families’ wages aren’t so low!). This can often be a bourgeoise family concern; thanks for making it transcend class.

    [Reply]

    Anita Reply:

    @Melinda – Thank you for your thoughtful comment.

    [Reply]

    January 28, 2010 at 7:44 pm by Charli

    Thanks Ms. Moshenberg, for posting something about keeping our kids safe. I think making industrial chemicals safe for infants and children (and everyone!) is something we can all get behind. To ensure that we really fix this problem we must include modern science language, which necessarily utilizes non-animal methods, in this bill; otherwise we’ll have another outdated bill on our hands.

    Currently, many toxicity tests are based on experiments in animals and use methods that were developed as long ago as the 1930’s; they and are slow, inaccurate, open to uncertainty and manipulation, and do not adequately protect human health. These tests take anywhere from months to years, and tens of thousands to millions of dollars to perform. More importantly, the current testing paradigm has a poor record in predicting effects in humans and an even poorer record in leading to actual regulation of dangerous chemicals.

    Alternatives to animal testing exist in a powerful way and many scientists advocate them. Chemical reform should not only modernize policy, but modernize the science that supports that policy. Let’s ensure chemicals reform uses all the necessary tools to truly make our children, our environment, and animals safe.

    [Reply]

    January 28, 2010 at 3:15 pm by Sian Wu

    Hi Claire,
    Thanks so much for sharing your story and bringing attention to the report. Can we start a fan club for your mom? We’ll work hard to spread this around! :-D

    [Reply]

    Leave a Comment

    Your name is required
    An Email address is required

    Notify me of follow-up comments via e-mail