Jo Comerford

    Election 2012: What’s the budget impact on moms and families?

    Posted August 14th, 2012 by

    If there was ever any doubt that the U.S. federal budget would claim center-stage in the 2012 presidential race, it vanished with Mitt Romney’s selection of House Budget Chair Paul Ryan (R-WI) as the GOP Vice Presidential nominee.

    Although Mitt Romney has emphasized he will run on a Romney budget, not a Ryan budget, he has already endorsed central elements of Ryan’s plan – such as significant cuts to Medicaid and education – and has indicated that the Congressman will play a lead role in shaping the Romney/Ryan platform.

    Paul Ryan’s federal budget proposal includes sweeping changes that supporters say are necessary to shrink bloated government and balance the federal budget, but opponents believe would be draconian in their impact on the American people and the economy.

    Differences between the Ryan and Obama

    Let’s look at some of the ways Paul Ryan’s federal budget projections differ dramatically from those of President Obama:

    The Ryan budget spends $599 billion more on the Pentagon than the Obama budget over the next decade.

    The Ryan budget cuts non-defense discretionary spending – including funding for veterans, the environment and social safety net programs – by $1.28 trillion below the Obama budget’s projections over the same ten years. For example, the education sector would see a 31 percent decline in funding for programs such as Title I and Head Start.

    These cuts would come on top of those imposed by sequestration through the Budget Control Act. In fact, Ryan’s budget would cut non-defense discretionary spending more than twice as much as the automatic spending cuts imposed by sequestration over the same period.

    The Ryan budget is also notable because it does not increase revenue. No real revenue gains, along with significant hikes in military spending, are two of the reasons the Ryan budget projects a $287 billion deficit in 2022.

    Differences between Romney and Obama

    Prior to choosing Ryan as his running mate, Governor Romney had already begun differentiating himself from President Obama on a number of key issues. While Romney has yet to put forth detailed budget numbers, his policy positions tell us a great deal.

    Time will tell just how much influence Congressman Ryan has on the GOP ticket.

    For now, one thing is certain: the 2012 presidential race will focus all eyes on the federal budget. The candidates’ budget numbers will tell us a lot about what they value – about their national priorities.

    What are your priorities for our nation, for your families and kids? Make your voice heard using National Priorities Project’s budget analysis.

    In the coming weeks, NPP’s voter materials will bolster your efforts to engage with one of the most critical elections of our time. We’ll fact-check candidate claims, host live Google chats, and much more.

    Stay tuned. NPP is your guide to the federal budget.

    This blog was originally posted at:

    Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...
    * * * * *


    August 16, 2012 at 5:47 pm by Chris

    So which budget is borrowing 40 cents for every dollar spent? Is it good for moms and families when our elected officials spend money they don’t have that will eventually have to be paid back by us in future tax increases? Is that the practice we want to encourage every mom to undertake; spend as much as we want for our families until we have to declare bankruptcy?

    The real truth is that neither Romney or Obama budgets are good for our families as they both are making our country poor and bankrupting our children’s futures.


    August 14, 2012 at 3:48 pm by Anita

    Thank you for this excellent analysis, Jo!


    Leave a Comment

    Your name is required
    An Email address is required

    Notify me of follow-up comments via e-mail