Philadelphia Mayor Vetoes Paid Sick Leave Bill
Posted June 29th, 2011 by Steve HerzenbergSome bad news out of Philadelphia Tuesday — Mayor Michael Nutter vetoed legislation that would have allowed every worker in the city to earn paid sick days.
As Lonnie Golden, a professor of economics and labor studies at Penn State Abington, and I wrote in an op-ed earlier this month, a paid sick days law would be good for business, good for the economy and good for public health in Philadelphia.
The public seems to agree. Seven in 10 Philadelphians supported the bill, according to a recent poll.
As we wrote in our op-ed:
Paid sick days are good for business and the community, as well as for families. Businesses save because worker turnover declines, lowering hiring costs and eliminating lost productivity as new workers get up to speed.
The cost of hiring is high compared to paying for sick days because managers and human-resource professionals who recruit earn more than lower-wage workers. Businesses also save because paid sick days reduce worker resentment and improve worker-manager relations.
The community benefits because, when sick workers stay home, disease doesn’t spread to other workers or to customers. Workers also obtain more timely medical care and recover faster, reducing lost productivity and holding down health-care costs.
Hopefully, City Council will agree and override the Mayor’s veto when it reconvenes in September.
1 Comment
June 30, 2011 at 1:28 pm by Anna H Petrov RDGee, guess Philadelphia isn’t the “city of brotherly love” any more. [Maybe we should have SISTERS running it?]
[Reply]
Leave a Comment