Good News for the Whole Family
Posted June 28th, 2011 by Mia DavisNewly introduced Safe Cosmetics Act (HR 2359) addresses the hidden toxic chemicals in your hair products, your tween’s highly fragranced lotion, and your baby’s bubble bath
By now you’ve probably heard of Brazilian Blowout, the popular hair straightening procedure that has come under fire in the past year for having formaldehyde in the “formaldehyde free” version of the product. That’s right- not only was this carcinogen found in the product at high levels (12% in one product, within the range used in embalming fluid)- it was in a product that claimed not to have it in there at all.
Maybe you wondered if this is one of those examples of a toxic product with deceitful marketing that sneaks its way onto the American market, and that a government agency like FDA later recalls…?
Nope.
Brazilian Blowout is made by a California company that stands by the safety of its products despite the high formaldehyde concentrations and health complaints from salon workers and clients. Other countries and some US states are taking action to remove Brazilian Blowout from store shelves, but the US FDA hasn’t moved an inch. The company’s use of a carcinogen in a hair product might be egregious, but it isn’t illegal in the US, and isn’t even rare. See, Brazilian Blowout is just the tip of the iceberg: Many cosmetics, even iconic baby brands Johnson & Johnson’s Baby Shampoo and Sesame Street Bubble Bath, contain carcinogens like formaldehyde and 1,4 dioxane, or other toxic chemicals that often aren’t listed on ingredient labels.
Formaldehyde and other toxic chemicals and heavy metals can be considered “contaminants” (i.e. not intentional ingredients) and therefore do not need to be listed on cosmetic ingredient labels. Many companies also hide ingredients under the label of “fragrance.” Last year the Campaign for Safe Cosmetics commissioned an independent lab to test 17 popular fragrance products. We found hidden fragrance chemicals, including hormone disrupters linked to a range of health effects including sperm damage, thyroid disruption and cancer. Companies using “fragrance” in lotions and shampoos are using the same tactics to hide ingredients- not from other companies, who can reverse engineer the product in a lab in no time, but from consumers like you and me.
While there are many companies making and selling safe cosmetics – with ingredients fully disclosed- and there are tips for consumers looking to purchase safe products, we cannot just shop our way out of this problem. We need the $50 billion cosmetics industry to be regulated in order to keep us safe and to keep the US competitive in a global market.
Fortunately, Reps. Jan Schakowsky (D-Ill.), Ed Markey (D-Mass.) or Tammy Baldwin (D-Wisc.) just introduced The Safe Cosmetics Act of 2011 (H.R.2359) to ensure that we know what’s in the products we buy, put on our bodies and our kids, and that we wash down the drain and into our waterways. And even more importantly, the bill will eliminate harmful chemicals like formaldehyde from the products we put on our bodies in the first place.
We need all hands on deck! Please tell your Representative that safe cosmetics are important to you and ask him or her to sign on as a co-sponsor of the Safe Cosmetics Act. Or, if you’re represented by one of the send them your thanks!
And please tell them that safe cosmetics is not a partisan issue. It is an issue that affects us all: everyone uses personal care products, and every one of us is in some way affected by cancer, infertility, learning disabilities and/or other serious health impacts linked to chemicals in our environment and in our everyday products like cosmetics. So let’s make cosmetics safe for all of us! We can do this, and we need to do it now, before any other families are unnecessarily exposed to toxic chemicals in products that should be benign.



6 Comments
July 6, 2011 at 11:00 pm by Savvy SisterAs a cancer survivor, I am all for full disclosure in any product that touches me and my family HOWEVER, when I read this bill in it’s entirety, it’s clear that the terms are very ambiguous and leave a lot to the government’s interpretation.
There is an answer for providing information to ensure our safety, but this bill is not quite it.
This bill is a bit more involved than just saying it’s a “bill to insure your personal safety”, because it’s a lot more than just that. It would put small business owners out of business by requiring unrealistic regulations…even the natural businesses who are trying to fight against corporate cosmetics by providing the public with organic wholesome products.
Please educate yourself before you mindlessly vote one way or the other.
Thank you!
[Reply]
July 4, 2011 at 2:52 pm by DennisThis Bill should be opposed in its current form as it is full of unscientific propaganda and scare tactics that will not serve the public in any way at all. Everyone agrees that “safe” cosmetics are critical but this bill does not do anything but throw blind support behind the EWG and CFSC.
Check out this Blog for all the scientific details of the bill and exactly what each of the potential problems are.
http://essentialu.typepad.com/
Just because it has the word “Safe” in the name does not make it so.
Dennis Fioravanti
CEO
Essential Labs
[Reply]
Denise Reply:
July 5th, 2011 at 10:06 am
@Dennis,
[Reply]
Denise Reply:
July 5th, 2011 at 10:23 am
Thank you Dennis…also check out http://www.personalcaretruth.com for a breakdown of what this bill really means, how it contradicts itself, how it will not benefit the end user and how it will put many cosmetic companies out of business.
This bill needs MAJOR changes before it will provide any benefit to the public. It is an uneducated assessment and indictment of one of the safest consumer industries out there. And it is frightening that it made it this far.
Finally, cosmetics are not something you need…if you are concerned about made up scientific issues, by all means don’t use them.
[Reply]
Well said, Mia! I really hope this bill passes. It would be revolutionary in protecting people’s health across the board, and I would love to be able to point to such an example in trying for similar progress here in Canada!
[Reply]
June 29, 2011 at 6:28 pm by Stacy MalkanThanks to Mia Davis and MomsRising for all you do to educate and activate moms. I believe women will be the ones to set things right, and it is going to take all of us to move this bill and other chemical reform efforts through Congress. It may take some time but we will eventually prevail! If you haven’t seen it, please check out the short film by Annie Leonard that explains (in an entertaining way!) what’s wrong with the products we put on our bodies.
http://www.StoryofCosmetics.org
http://www.SafeCosmetics.org
With your help, we can give the beauty industry a makeover.
Stacy Malkan
Author, “Not Just a Pretty Face: The Ugly Side of the Beauty Industry”
[Reply]
Leave a Comment