80,000 Chemicals in Everyday Products, But Who’s Counting (No one)
Posted July 28th, 2009 by Janelle SorensenI don’t know if you’ve heard yet, but I’ve read over and over about the 80,000 chemicals in everyday products (most of which have only been in use since World War II). It’s a stunning figure used as an attention getter when people discuss health issues linked to certain toxic chemicals. Some sources put it higher and some put it lower. Some say they’re all in use and some say they’re just “registered.” I did some research and what I found is that no one really knows.
It turns out that more than 80,000 synthetic chemicals are indeed simply registered for use today with the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). How many of these are actively used is hotly debated. In fact, the EPA cannot even nail it down—they estimate anywhere from 9,000-15,000. And, roughly 3,000 qualify as “high production volume” (HPV) – meaning more than a million pounds of each one are produced in or imported into the United States every year.
Given that we don’t even know how many of the 80,000 chemicals registered for use are actually being used, it should come as no surprise that no one knows the amount of total chemical production in the U.S. The only guess we have is an estimate based on the roughly 3,000 HPV chemicals – 4.4 to 7.1 trillion pounds of these chemicals are produced/imported annually.
Did that confuse you? It’s because we don’t keep track of all chemicals, only those that are produced or imported at more than a million pounds per year (anything less than a million pounds is apparently insignificant – I guess it just became too much trouble to keep track of everything). And given the almost 3 trillion pound spread between the HPV chemical estimates, we don’t even really keep track of those.
Try to visualize this massive quantity of chemicals. For illustrative purposes, let’s go with the average of the two aforementioned numbers, 5.75 trillion or, 5,750,000,000,000 pounds. These days we throw around numbers like million and billion and trillion without a second thought. But, consider the staggering size of this number. If you had your own little chemical lab and you created one pound of chemicals every second, it would take you over 180,000 years to get to 5.75 trillion. The US produces and imports this much every year (and that number continues to grow).
Now, allow me to shed some light on the true spectacle of ignorance.
No basic toxicity information is publicly available for 43 percent of the HPV chemicals and full information on toxicity is publicly available for only 7 percent.
Allow me to reiterate because it’s so mind boggling: Almost half of the chemicals that we are using in difficult to imagine amounts, almost half, have NO testing data at all on basic toxicity???? And, only SEVEN PERCENT have a full set of BASIC test data???
In addition, the toxicity information we have is a chemical-by-chemical assessment. Well enough on paper, but we are not exposed to chemicals one-by-one. We are exposed to chemicals in a soup-like fashion and every one of us has our own individual recipe. Given the enormous mixtures we are exposed to daily, there is no credible, scientific way to test for health impacts and we keep adding more ingredients (2,000-3,000 a year to be kind of exact).
International authorities agree that six basic tests are necessary for a minimum understanding of a chemical’s toxicity. For each chemical, the basic set of tests costs about $205,000. It would cost the chemical industry less than $427 million to fill all of the basic screening set data gaps for the high production volume chemicals. $427 million sounds like a lot of money to you and I, and the chemical industry says it’s completely unfeasible to consider doing all of these tests; it costs too much; it would paralyze them and stunt progress. But, consider this – $427 million only represents 0.2% of the total annual sales of the top 100 U.S. chemical companies. It is a drop in the bucket to them and; thus, utterly outrageous that the tests have not been performed.
So there you have it. Our modern society relies on thousands of chemicals, but we don’t know how many, or how much, or how they interact with each other or how they impact ecosystems or human health and development. It is an unbelievable, unrestrained, global experiment. It’s so huge it’s hard to wrap your head around it. So, maybe don’t try. What you should try to do is reduce your exposure by buying less stuff and looking for more natural choices (like using baking soda and vinegar to clean). You can also help strengthen the regulatory system that’s allowed this experiment to continue virtually unfettered for so many years by supporting the Kid Safe Chemicals Act.




5 Comments
The reason we have so little data is because when the Toxic Substances Control Act – the general law regulating chemicals in the US – was put into place, it grandfathered in those 65,000 chemicals currently in use. They were deemed safe just because they were in use. Like bisphenol A. Like many of the phthalates. Like lots of chemicals.
And most toxicity data available was relatively limited, and human toxicity data even more so. Human toxicity data was mostly limited to occupational exposures for men, primarily 18 to 45, primarily white. No kids. Mostly no women. Basically, no sensitive populations.
We need reform.
Jennifer Taggart
http://www.thesmartmama.com
[Reply]
July 30, 2009 at 10:58 am by KathleenJanelle Sorenson,
You want to talk to me. You are gonna want to talk to me and one other. Will be available next week. I’ll wait for your email.
Kathleen
[Reply]
July 29, 2009 at 11:05 pm by TraciThanks so much for shedding light on this subject matter. It’s so hard to be so informed because it literally scares the crap out of me. I do my part be buying products that support a clean environment. I also have awesome air filters for home and in my car. Let me know if i can do anything to help make these “people” do the right thing by testing these chemicals. Until then, i’d love to take care of the BPA situation and cell phone towers near schools. Wow it’s amazing how money makes people loss there morals. I must say i for one am so grateful for this website and the moms who just like me who are willing to fight for the health of our kids.
[Reply]
July 29, 2009 at 5:44 pm by LisaatEWGJanelle, You make some excellent points (esp. re cost), and thank you for pointing people to EWG’s new toxics policy blog, where we discuss the latest science and the very real, very urgent need for federal policy reform.
Knowing what an engaged group is here on Moms Rising, I invite you to join our grassroots campaign to move reform forward. We have an activist toolkit and a great house party kit on our site: http://bit.ly/lGvoC. And of course a Facebook Cause so you can stay in the loop: http://bit.ly/22QV7.
Or email me directly and let’s get started!! I’m: lisa@ewg.org.
Together we can make this happen, because, let’s face it, it’s moms who are going to do the heavy grassroots lifting on this one, isn’t it?
[Reply]
July 29, 2009 at 3:21 am by Chez VondaNicely written. I am not surprised at the lack of information. We, Americans, take for granted that someone somewhere has done the work necessary for our freedom. Unfortunately, there are thousands, and potentially millions, of chemicals with which we and our children could come into contact that will cause harm, in the short and long-run. We see public health data trends for chronic diseases like asthma and cancer rise with the increasing use of these chemicals. Other serious health & developmental issues, (obesity, AD(H)D, diabetes, arthritis) can be linked to chemicals we ingest, inhale and/or otherwise absorb during our daily lives. I have opted to convert my home/lifestyle to support companies that have a proven track record of enhancing lives with their effective eco-friendly products. Decide for yourself the best methods to keep you and your family safe.
[Reply]
Leave a Comment