Women and Healthcare – We’ve Got More Skin In The Game
Posted September 8th, 2009 by Valerie YoungFrom Your (Wo)manInWashington blog
It’s tempting to just screen out all the noise and hoopla about healthcare reform. The TV glows with dozens of “experts” nattering on and on. Newspapers are full of charts and graphs. One group yells, another group yells louder. It would be easy to shrug your shoulders, say it’s a mess, and look away. It would be so easy.
But you mustn’t.
What happens will matter to you terribly because you are a woman. Because women have babies, they receive more medical care than men. We get mammograms, pap smears, pre-natal care. We decide when a child is sick enough to go to the doctor. We make appointments for our parents, our in-laws, our spouses, and our partners.
Women are more likely to delay or go without medical treatment because of the expense. We put others first, at risk to ourselves. Women spend a greater share of household income on health care than men. They may be charged higher premiums, particularly during their childbearing years, or have maternity and pre-natal services excluded from coverage all together.
Most part-time workers are women, and as such have no access to employer-sponsored health insurance programs. Less than half of all working women can get coverage through their own employer. Many depend on their spouses’ employers, or if they can afford it, buy coverage on the individual market. Single women are twice as likely to be uninsured than married women. Our current system is rationed by cost, employment, and marital status, among other factors. As a result, in 2007 more than 21 million women in this country had no health care insurance at all.
So you just can’t afford not to care. You could be one of those women. You may be one of those women. The cost of not doing anything, for ourselves, our families, our communities, and our country is far, far more expensive than finding a solution.
So educate yourself. Reflect and determine where you are in the debate. Talk to your friends and family. And talk to the people who represent you in Congress, where these decisions will be made. You have too much skin in the game to sit on the bench for this one.
Click here to learn more about why the current health care system does not work for women.
Click here to read more from Your (Wo)man in Washington.
2 Comments
September 8, 2009 at 8:30 pm by AdrienneIf you look at healthcare statistics provided by the CDC, this is not just a woman’s issue, it is everyone’s issue. Interpreting some of the data from CDC surveys, one can determine that socio-economic status greatly impacts a person’s health status as well as their access to insurance. I support the Obama initiative that “prevention is the best medicine”. It is time to tackle this issue from all sides. Teach people what to eat (whole foods, not processed), exercise and pursue your education so that you may have better opportunities to access insurance and medical procedures. As you can see from Sue’s comment, socialist medicine is not necessarily the answer. A system that works is the answer. I would like to see Congress do the research and present it to the American public so that we can see exactly what it is they want to change, not just that they want a change. Look to the healthcare models that do work, and then we can make an intelligent change. We already have one system that is abused, we don’t need another one.
[Reply]
September 8, 2009 at 6:01 pm by Sue JohnsonOur healthcare system is not the only system that does not work for women. Today’s London Mail article (http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-1211754/Restrictions-prescription-osteoporosis-drugs-defy-belief-says-leading-doctor.html) points out that the UK’s National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence is restricting access to a effective osteoporosis medications, requiring women with osteoporosis to become more debilitated before being allow access to the newer agents. So the UK thinks it is clinically effective to allow a woman’s osteoporosis condition to deteriorate to a more advanced stage before allowing her access to a drug that can reduce her bone loss and prevent bone and hip fractures. This is very similar to the way they treat their women with breast cancer.
[Reply]
Trackbacks
Leave a Comment