Why Is There a Weed Killer in Your Drinking Water?
Posted August 24th, 2009 by Alice ShabecoffDid you happen to read the front page article, “Debating How Much Weed Killer is Safe in Your Water Glass,” in this Sunday’s NY Times? I’m adding to this good piece of journalism so that you can see why and how a harmful chemical such as the weed killer atrazine is allowed to make its way into your home. There’s more to it than the article reveals. This chemical does even more harm to fetuses and children, EPA is even more complicit in allowing us to drink it in, and the manufacturer plays an even more shameful part.
The company that makes this chemical is the Swiss-based Syngenta, the world’s largest agrochemical manufacturer. It used to be known as Novartis. Yes, it’s the same company that manufactures anti-cancer drugs, including those championed by Lance Armstrong. That means Syngenta is in essence making the chemicals that cause the cancer that its pharmaceutical arm profits from ‘curing.’
Syngenta told EPA that the high rates of prostate cancer among its atrazine factory workers is only because the company is so vigilant in screening for cancer. OK, said the agency. In 2003, in the same month that the European Union banned atrazine, the EPA decided to keep it on the U.S. market with no new restrictions. Before arriving at that decision, the EPA had held about fifty private meetings with Syngenta and consulted two advisory committees composed of only Syngenta and EPA representatives.
The chemical was, in fact, never allowed in Switzerland. But, since it’s cheap and it works, and because EPA gave its seal of approval, it’s become the most widely used weed killer in the corn belt states of America, sprayed over tens of millions of U.S. acres. The greatest concentrations are in that part of our nation, but even if you don’t live in the Midwest near a corn field, you and your children may encounter it on your lawns, gardens, parks, and golf courses.
You don’t want atrazine in your drinking water, especially if you are pregnant. The Times explained the chemical can cause birth defects, low birth weight and premature births. But wait, there’s more. Here’s a run-down of atrazine’s other possible effects. It can alter the way a person’s genes perform – the way they turn on or off– which may lead to cancer as well as learning and behavioral problems. (For instance, a gene that should turn on to fight a carcinogen or neural damage may fail to do so.)
It’s also a gender-bender, capable of disrupting the fetal and child’s hormone system. It turns male frogs into hermaphrodites and it can do something along the same lines to fetuses (the hormones and mechanisms of sexual development in frogs are like those in humans). When an independent scientist-researcher discovered this unsettling fact, Syngenta cut off the funding for his study. The Kansas Corn Growers Association added its muscle power by launching a campaign to blast his credibility.
As for the industry argument that low levels cannot harm, first recall that, as the NY Times article mentioned, concentrations spike sharply from time to time in community water supplies without any notice to residents. Second, the frog studies showed that when tadpoles – rather than adult frogs — were exposed, twenty percent of them grew up hermaphroditic even though the level of the chemical was thirty thousand times lower than previous tests, on adult frogs, had indicated.
In sum, atrazine is a poster child for the blatant inadequacies of our nation’s chemical manufacture and approval process, and for the corporate pursuit of profit.
What does this mean to you?
First, especially if you are or intend to become pregnant, or if you have children, install a water filter. A whole house filter is best (because our skin absorbs water when we shower), but smaller filters do an ok job for drinking water.
Second, get behind a piece of legislation that’s languished in Congress for years – the Kids Safe Chemical Act. Let your local legislator hear from you.
Third, call your local water authority and pressure them to test your community’s water often.
–
Alice is co-author with her husband Philip of Poisoned Profits: The Toxic Assault on our Children. See pgs 175-177 for the tale of atrazine.



7 Comments
August 26, 2009 at 8:29 pm by Patricia SmirhThere are no surprises here. This is nothing new but nothing seems to change. Perhaps if enough people educate themselves we can force our government to take action. The agencies that are supposed to protect us have fed us to the wolves. Do not be so naive to think this is only an issue for kids. I am an adult that was poisoned by a pyrethroid pesticide and it has destroyed my life. Doctors do not want to get involved so who is twisting their arms to hide the truth? Lawyers do not want to get involved because the chemical industry has very deep pockets and can outspend you. Think about Agent Orange and Gulf War Syndrome which are both linked to pesticides. Will we never learn? The rising rates of autism and cancer are being linked to environmental toxins but we do nothing to stop the madness.
[Reply]
August 25, 2009 at 10:29 pm by Christine GardnerThank you so much for highlighting this important story reported on the front page of yesterday’s New York Times Sunday paper. Having read your incredible book and followed many of the issues associated with our pervasive exposure to estrogenic, carcinogenic or mutagenic chemicals in our day-to-day lives, the threat of atrazine in our water serves as yet another reminder of our vulnerability as Americans living in a loosely regulated and increasingly toxic society.
At the base level, we just want to find the means to understand where the threats may be lurking, and devise a system that protects our children – and ourselves – from harm.
This will only happen when we begin to listen to what researchers are finding and pay attention when the information trickles to the mainstream through the MANY barriers it had to cross along its path. Thank you for amplifying its importance to all of us.
[Reply]
Alice Shabecoff Reply:
August 26th, 2009 at 10:03 am
@Christine Gardner,
Thank you so much for your wonderful comment. It makes the effort worthwhile.
I’d like to know about your own interest in this subject. You can email me at ashabecoff@gmail.com.
best,
Alice
[Reply]
Though I cannot comment on any “strategic planning” for the company, I can give you the following “coincidental” facts: 1) In Jan. 2000, a Novartis-funded researcher shows that atrazine increases estrogen production in human cancer cells; 2) In July 2000 Novartis applies to FDA to start selling an estrogen-synthesis blocker; 3) In Nov 2000, Novartis stops selling atrazine, but Syngenta (daughter company) continues to sell it.
I think Syngenta’s rebuttal says it all:
“Syngenta assumes no obligation to update forward-looking statements to reflect actual results…”
(from http://www.prweb.com/releases/2009/08/prweb2782434.htm)
[Reply]
August 25, 2009 at 11:21 am by tyrone B hayesThank you very much for this piece. One of atrazine’s main modes of action is an increase in estrogen production. This mechanism is important in breast cancer and indeed atrazine promotes breast cancer in lab rats and is associated with breast and prostate cancer in some published human studies. Your readers should know that one of those anti-cancer drugs made by Novartis (letrozole) is used to block estrogen production for breast cancer patients.
[Reply]
August 24, 2009 at 8:20 pm by Denise RobinetteThank you so much for this article and for the book you wrote. We, as a society, have alot to learn about chemicals and their health effects. Buyer beware – just because it is on the shelf, does NOT make it safe. Unfortunately, there will be generations of our families who are negatively affected.
[Reply]
Diane Moore Reply:
November 15th, 2009 at 3:13 am
As happy as I was to find this website, its heartbreaking to read how most of society is totally ignorantas to what is happening in our sad world. A big thanks to you for caring, and publishing the facts, and helping us to become aware of what is really going on.
I am going to buy your book asap, and will pass it on to others.
Its a sad world we live in, when we can’t trust government agencies to do what they are supposed to do, protect us and our children.
Is this what our generation is going to be remembered for, if our children and grandchildren live long enough?
[Reply]
Trackbacks
Leave a Comment