Barbara Coombs Lee

    The Religious Right’s Assault on Palliative Care

    Posted May 25th, 2012 by

    Anti-choice forces are taking aim at end-of-life care. They’re after people at the end of a long decline who exercise their right to stop life-prolonging technology or treatment. Their tactic is to tie the hands of doctors attending those patients, when palliative treatment might ease the patient’s chosen death. They seek to undermine the widespread agreement among doctors: Treatments can be stopped, and should be stopped as humanely as possible, when patients’ wishes are clear.

    Palliative care image via Shutterstock.com

    But the medical establishment’s support for patient choice exists within a particular, and peculiar, bioethical framework. Doctors usually invoke the Catholic doctrine of double effect to explain how they can perform an act, such as administering sedatives and disconnecting a ventilator, knowing the two acts will cause the patient’s death. The doctrine holds that a person is not responsible for what they know will ensue as the product of their actions, so much as what they intend. In essence, “my intention was not to cause death, my intention was to ease suffering.”

    A problem arises for palliative care physicians when people question their intention. Since it is impossible to prove a thought, doctors will always be vulnerable to accusations about intentions. This vulnerability is exploited when anti-choice advocates promote legislation that 1) raise the bar on what will pass for lawful practice and thought, 2) magnify penalties for those found guilty of forbidden thoughts and intentions and 3) encourage scrutiny and whistleblowing by onlookers and medical colleagues. And the medical lobby has done little to oppose these bills.

    Recent events illustrate the danger.

    Georgia HB 1114, passed last month to prohibit assisted suicide. Shaped by Georgia Right to Life and the Georgia Catholic Conference (thanked from the floor of the House) and with no visible objection from the physician community HB 1114 purports to outlaw suicide assistance. Here I would like to affirm my strong support for clear laws and harsh penalties for those who incite and abet suicide.

    But a mere 19 of this bill’s 57 lines address actual criminal behavior. The bill’s drafters wasted few words on perpetrators of violence, guns, nooses and other atrocities by which online predators and other malicious enablers encourage self-destructive impulses of the mentally ill. The heinous crime of inciting a despondent or disturbed person to kill themselves seems almost an afterthought in this bill.

    The bulk of the bill — 37 lines — frets over patient decision-making and medical treatment in minute detail. It focuses on doctors more than the voyeurs and predators that endanger society. The new law repeatedly specifies that any withholding, withdrawing, prescribing, administering or dispensing must be solely intended and calculated to relieve symptoms and never to cause death. Some tried to allow treatment that “eases the dying process,” but the lawmakers deemed that language too permissive and generous.

    Georgia lawmakers not only paste targets on healthcare professionals, they also armed those taking aim at forbidden intentions with the state’s RICO (Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organization) law. The heavy artillery of RICO magnifies the state’s policing authority, extends penalties, adds civil liability and enables prosecution of individuals only tangentially involved in the patient’s care.

    A recent study showed onlookers and watchful colleagues already threaten palliative care physicians with accusations of murder and euthanasia. Over half of palliative physicians report they have endured such accusations at least once, some as often as 6 times, over the past 5 years. And in the bills they promote, anti-choice advocates enable these watchdogs.

    Patients need more legislative vigilance on their behalf. Dying patients need a voice in our nation’s statehouses. Without one, the creation of thought crimes, threats of exorbitant punishment and hyper-vigilant whistle-blowers could stunt the future of palliative care.

    Image credit: Shutterstock.

    Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...
    Posted Under: CA Healthcare
    Permalink

    7 Comments

    May 28, 2012 at 7:13 am by Roe Breslin

    Well of course! THIS is what the Republicans, Tea Partiers and religious right referred to as “the death panels” when President Obama and the Democrats proposed the original Affordable (Health) Care Act! They successfully scared people into believing that your relatives could arbitrarily decide to end your life without your consent or knowledge, proving once again that if you LIE long and loudly enough (stupid) people will BELIEVE you!

    [Reply]

    May 26, 2012 at 10:58 pm by Joan Hamann

    Personally I believe God GAVE me this life, therefore it is MINE. Excruciating pain is for someone else, not this big chicken….The party of smaller government, only applies to corporations, not people.

    MomsRising, you need a Like button!

    [Reply]

    May 26, 2012 at 10:16 pm by Linda Lee

    Conservatives show their hypocrisy yet again! They cry about government interfering in their lives, but are all too willing to use government to impose their views on others. What you do with your body should be your decision alone! So much for land of the free!

    [Reply]

    Joan Hamann Reply:

    @Linda Lee, I LOVE this comment, and am rather fond of the other comment by Dawn too!

    [Reply]

    May 26, 2012 at 10:06 pm by Dawn

    Well, It doesn’t surprise me in the slightest. They’ve gone after so many other freedoms, so why not this one. I, for one, believe in assisted suicide for the terminally ill. If I were suffering with no chance of recovery and wish to end my life peacefully with doctor assistance rather than live the remainder of my time in excruciating pain, then that is my right. I don’t care or recognize what “the church” or anyone else thinks or believes when it comes to my right to decide what happens to me.

    [Reply]

    May 26, 2012 at 9:57 pm by Sandra

    Where are you living??

    [Reply]

    Joan Hamann Reply:

    Sandra, It really doesn’t matter, as long as it’s not Georgia. Or does it? Georgia is surely not the only state trying this, ahem, stuff is it?

    [Reply]

    Leave a Comment

    Your name is required
    An Email address is required

    Notify me of follow-up comments via e-mail