Johnson & Johnson Removing Toxic Chemicals from Products
Posted September 12th, 2012 by Margie Kelly
Last month, industry giant Johnson & Johnson made a stunning announcement: it was prepared to eliminate a “most wanted” list of chemicals from its beauty and baby products lines by 2015.
Johnson & Johnson plans to phase out preservatives like quanternium-15, which releases formaldehyde, a known carcinogen, and triclosan, an antibacterial that may harm the human immune system. Another chemical that Johnson & Johnson pledged to eliminate is 1,4 dioxane, which has been linked to increased risk of breast cancer.
Johnson & Johnson contends the chemicals are safe and meet all government standards. However, as Susan Nettesheim, Vice President, Product Stewardship and Toxicology wrote, “…what matters most isn’t what we think, it’s what the people who use our products think.”
For years, the Campaign for Safe Cosmetics had been pressuring the company to make the switch. The Campaign’s report finding cancer-causing formaldehyde in the iconic Johnson & Johnson Baby Shampoo raised a ruckus among parents who don’t want to wash their children’s heads with a notorious cancer-causing chemical.
As a result, Johnson & Johnson announced last year that it would remove formaldehyde from its baby products. The latest news takes them a step closer to purging their product lines of dangerous chemicals. Kudos to Johnson & Johnson for their decision to make products safe.
Which brings me to Tide Free & Gentle laundry detergent and the Proctor & Gamble Company.
You’ve probably heard about or seen Tide Free & Gentle, which is marketed to moms with newborn babies. P&G spent millions advertising its “Proud sponsors of Moms” brand during the 2012 Summer Olympics, to great fanfare and celebration in the media.
Those ads never mention that Tide Free & Gentle contains 1,4 dioxane, the cancer-causing chemical Johnson & Johnson is phasing out of use. P&G is well aware that 1,4 dioxane is a chemical that should not be in its products. In 2010, the company reformulated Herbal Essences shampoo to eliminate 1,4 dioxane. Yet P&G has decided to leave the cancer-causing chemical in a detergent it markets to new moms.
Lori Alper, a mom blogger at Groovy Green Livin’ and Healthy Child Healthy World Parent Ambassador, put up a petition urging Tide to get 1,4 dioxane out of its products. Nearly 80,000 people have signed the petition – will you?
Together we can get P&G to hear our concerns about cancer-causing chemicals in Tide and make the decision that Johnson & Johnson made:
“…we’re changing them [chemicals] out because we’re listening to the people who rely on our products, and we want to be sure they have peace of mind bringing our products into their homes and caring for themselves and their families. Nothing is more important to us.”
Let’s make Tide Free & Gentle safe for our families. Please sign the petition today!



3 Comments
November 1, 2012 at 2:02 am by rebecca nearyI am very new at doing online stuff but I have come to the conclusion that what my grandmother said “Do it and it’s done” is true so I put together a petition and hope word gets around in chemical sensitivity community, COPD, Migraine sufferers and Asthma folks to look at my petition and sign if they agree so that three of the major manufacturers of cleaning, laundry and scented candle/plug in type products can hear from a lot of people instead of just me like an old crank, which I admit I am. Please forward this to anyone affected by fragrances for any health reason.
Sorry my “start up” of my campaign is a little wordy and discombobulated but these companies keep telling me there products are not bothering anybody so they need to hear from bothered people who can’t leave their windows open on neighbors laundry day etc!
Church and Dwight, Proctor and Gamble and SCJohnson: re-examine scented product formulas to see what is making some people sick by Rebecca Neary
and here is the link http://www.change.org/petitions/church-and-dwight-proctor-and-gamble-and-scjohnson-re-examine-scented-product-formulas-to-see-what-is-making-some-people-sick-3
It would be great if people were very specific about how fragrances affect them when saying why they sign. these companies claim no one complains except me.
Rebecca Neary
San Diego CA
[Reply]
September 24, 2012 at 4:33 pm by MatkasseJohnson and Johnson baby products are very useful for baby. Such a nice information provide you in this blog post. Thanks
[Reply]
September 13, 2012 at 1:59 pm by Ashley BoydIs it me or does 2015 sound like a long time to wait? Any explanation about why it takes over 2 years to get this changed?? It is good news, but not coming soon enough.
[Reply]
Leave a Comment